In the main part of the agreement, the word Kashmir is mentioned in two separate sections. Section 5 of the agreement provides that “in Jammu and Kashmir, the Line of Control resulting from the ceasefire of 17 December 1971 shall be respected by both parties, without prejudice to the recognized position of both parties”. This claim shows that India, through the 1972 agreement, abandoned its own claim that Kashmir was an integral part of it. According to section seven: “The two Governments agree that in the future their respective Heads of State and Government will meet at a time favourable to both parties and that, in the meantime, representatives of both sides will meet to discuss further modalities and modalities for the establishment of lasting peace and the normalization of relations, including issues relating to the repatriation of prisoners of war and civilian internees. a final settlement of Jammu and Kashmir and the restoration of diplomatic relations.¬†This statement indicates that, despite India`s domestic attitude towards the consumption of its people in 1972, India bilaterally admitted that the Kashmir issue had not yet been definitively adopted. The agreement did not prevent relations between the two countries from deteriorating into armed conflict, most recently during the 1999 Kargil war. In Operation Meghdoot in 1984, India seized the entire inhospitable Siachen Glacier region, where the border was not clearly defined in the agreement (perhaps because the area was deemed too arid to be controversial); This was considered by Pakistan as a violation of the Simla agreement. Most of the deaths that followed in the Siachen conflict were caused by natural disasters, for example. B avalanches in 2010, 2012 and 2016. While the deadline for the settlement of the Kashmir issue is not set by the Simla Agreement, it is also not written that the final settlement of Kashmir can be suspended indefinitely. In this way, the right of the Kashmiris to self-determination was made conditional on the absence of a time clause in the agreement. The Kashmiris may demand the time clause to enforce their right to self-determination.

The Delhi Agreement on the Repatriation of War and Civilian Internees is a tripartite agreement between the above-mentioned States, signed on 28 August 1973. The agreement was signed by Kamal Hossain, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Government of Bangladesh, Sardar Swaran Singh, Minister of Foreign Affairs of India, and Aziz Ahmed, Minister of State for Defence and Foreign Affairs of the Government of Pakistan. T92 [10] [11] The agreement was the result of the determination of both countries to “put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have so far affected their relations.” It designed the measures to be taken to further normalize mutual relations and also defined the principles that should govern their future relations. [4] [5] [3] Donald Trump`s offer to help India and Pakistan resolve the Kashmir issue has sparked great controversy after India refuted the US president`s claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had asked a question about it. . . .

Uncategorized