It is therefore requested with respect that an injunction be issued in an action for annulment of documents aimed at restricting points 1 to 6 of the defendant, to assert any legal title, interest and in any case in any case vis-à-vis the requesting country and to transfer the country in favor of a person on the basis of transfers / lawyer / title / sale , etc. cited above. In addition, please that defendants Nos. 1 to 6 may also be prevented from interfering in the peaceful possession of the applicant, expropriating him, instituting any type of construction and altering in any way the type of recourse to property may be kindly accepted in favour of the applicant and against the defendants until the final decision of the main action. For the above reasons, we consider that the opinion of the High Court, which authorized the request for a written decision, suffers from a serious infirmity. The appeal therefore deserves to be admitted. Consequently, the judgment under appeal is set aside. The Court of Justice is responsible for continuing the trial on the merits. There is no cost schedule. 44. In any event, I believe that the action for annulment of the deed of sale must be upheld before the civil court. It is apparent from a reading of the content of the action that the action was not the decision on the applicant`s rights as bhumidhars of the land at issue, but the annulment of the deed of sale for fraud and non-payment of consideration.

18. As indicated above, Chapter II also contains Part B, which deals specifically with the transfer of immovable property. A brief summary of the provisions of Chapter II, Part B (§ 38 to 53) is necessary. A reading of §38, 41, 42, 43, 48 and 53 shows that a sale of immovable property does not always lead to the immediate transfer of property to the buyer. There are a number of exceptions to the principle set out in article 8 of the VERV Act, with the exception of the two important conditions of the transfer, namely: “that the assignor has the right to transfer or that the assignor has the power to dispose of transferable assets that are not its own”. If the contemptuous person or a person authorized by such a verifier has no power, either because there is no such right of delegation or because there is no such power of delegation, the remedies of the true owner, who is authorized to the delegation but who has not done so, could be multiple…

Uncategorized